|
|
Need this resource for a different chapter? Use the pulldown menu above to get
right to it.
News Summaries
LVMH and Gucci
Giants in the Luxury Goods
Industry
LVMH, Louis Vuitton Moet Hennessy, a $40 million conglomerate, is
the dominant firm in the luxury goods industry. In 1999, LVMH's
revenues were $8.4 billion, a 23% increase from the previous year.
Its stock price was around $400 per share in April, 2000. Led by CEO
Bernard Arnault, the company has grown to its current size by buying
numerous, small, family-run businesses. LVMH's acquisitions include
Christian Lacroix, Celine, and Kenzo, producers of designer clothes;
Christian Dior, Givenchy, and Sephora, fragrances and cosmetics; TAG
Heuer and Ebel, watches; Dom Perignon, champagne; Chandon and
Pommery, wine; Berluti, men's shoes; and Louis Vuitton and Loewe,
leather goods.
Smaller firms, such as Ralph Lauren, Calvin Klein, and Tommy
Hilfiger, are finding it increasingly difficult to compete with LVMH.
Gucci, with 1999 revenues of $1 billion, is LVMH's closest
competitor. Gucci, whose acquisitions include Yves Saint Laurent and
Sergio Rossio, also designs and produces high quality, personal
luxury goods, including clothing, leather goods, watches, jewelry,
and perfume.
Arnault and his rival, Gucci CEO Domenico De Sole, compete to hire
young designers who are popular with the fashion press. Even if most
people do not actually buy their newest, most daring creations
featured in fashion magazines, the publicity that they generate has
helped to advertise their mainstream apparel with the same label.
Although both companies have websites, LVMH has taken the lead on the
Internet. In addition to investing in eBay, a European Internet
service provider called LibertySurf, and France's top Internet
portal, Nomade, Arnault is developing eLuxury, LVMH's own luxury
goods portal.
Both companies hope to avoid the mistake of overlicensing
retailers to sell their products, the problem of the 1970's for
designers such as Pierre Cardin and Yves Saint Laurent, whose goods
began to show up in discount stores and pharmacies. Gucci and LVMH
are cutting the number of licensing agreements for their products in
order to maintain the value of their brands among luxury goods
consumers. For many purchasers of these goods, the product is even
more desirable if it is available only in exclusive stores.
Discussion Questions
- Do LVMH and Gucci exhibit the characteristics of oligopoly
firms? Explain.
- Could licensing agreements be considered a form of restraint
of trade? Why or why not?
- What is the price effect? Can luxury goods producers avoid the
price effect? Why or why not?
Key Words
Oligopoly, Game theory, Luxury goods, Nonprice competition
Sources
Greenfeld, Karl Taro. "Battle Deluxe." Time. May 1, 2000,
pages 48-50.
www.LVMH.com
www.Gucci.com
 Copyright ©, Harcourt College Publishers, A Harcourt Higher Learning Company. Read our Privacy Policy. All rights reserved. For problems or suggestions concerning this service, please contact the webmaster.
|