|
Connections
|
Connections to Key Topics with Additional Resources
| Topic | Connections and Additional Resources |
| Supply and Demand |
When real per-capita income rises, perhaps due to an increase in productivity, then consumption spending will usually increase as well. The implication is that for normal and luxury goods, such as vacation travel and restaurant meals, a rise in real per-capita income will cause demand to increase. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Utility and Consumer Choice |
A rise in real per-capita income implies that per-capita income rises faster than prices. If preferences do not change, then a rise in real per-capita income will increase consumption. Because of diminishing marginal utility, an increase in consumption will drive down the marginal utility per dollar spent on the last unit consumed. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Utility and Consumer Choice |
In July 2001 President Bush signed into law a $1.35 trillion tax cut that reduced marginal tax rates across the board. The President said that the tax cuts would help boost the economy, which was in recession at the time. The concept of utility and consumer choice is useful in understanding how consumer spending on specific goods and services is affected by an increase in disposable income. The income effect states that an increase in disposable income will result in an increase in the quantity of normal and luxury goods and services purchased. An increase in the quantity of a particular good or service consumed will increase total utility, but the law of diminishing marginal utility tells us that marginal utility falls as the quantity of a particular good or service consumed increases. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Income Distribution and Poverty |
Real per-capita income is an average measure of a person's inflation-adjusted income in a particular country. Since no country has a perfectly equal distribution of income, real per-capita income always overstates material living standards for the poorest in society. Policies that promote growth in real per-capita income do not always reach the poorest in society. In fact, the disparity between the world's richest and poorest people has been rising. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Productivity and Growth |
Gains in real per-capita income are generated by improvements in productivity. Productivity is in turn linked to business investment. Countries with relatively strong business investment tend to have more rapid gains in real per-capita income. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Output, Income, and the Price Level |
Real per-capita disposable personal income is derived from national income accounts. Total personal income in a country is equal to its GDP minus depreciation and indirect business taxes. If we subtract personal taxes and inflation, and divide by population, we then have real per-capita disposable personal income. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Aggregate Demand/ Aggregate Supply |
An increase in real per-capita income, perhaps due to a rise in productivity, will cause consumption spending and aggregate expenditures to also increase. An increase in aggregate expenditures will cause the aggregate demand curve to shift outwards. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Taxes, Spending, and Deficits |
Disposable personal income is the portion of personal income that is available for consumption spending or saving after personal taxes are taken out. Thus real per-capita disposable personal income can be increased (at least in the short run) by a cut in the personal tax rate. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Developing and Transitional Economies | Developing
and transitional economies have low levels of real per-capita income compared
to the U.S., Japan, and Western European countries. Many nations continue
to transition to industrial economies from those that rely on subsistence
agriculture and raw natural resource commodity exports.
Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Elasticity | In
July 2001 President Bush signed into law a $1.35 trillion tax cut that
reduced marginal tax rates across the board. The President said that the
tax< cuts would help boost the economy, which was in recession at the
time. The concept of income elasticity of demand is useful in understanding
how consumer spending on specific goods and services is affected by an
increase in disposable income. An increase in disposable income will result
in an increase in the quantity of normal and luxury goods and services
purchased. If indeed consumers respond to the increase in disposable income
by increasing their spending on goods and services, the tax cut will have
a stimulative effect on the macroeconomy. . Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Government and the Economy | In
July 2001 President Bush signed into law a $1.35 trillion tax cut that
reduced marginal tax rates across the board. The President said that the
tax cuts would help boost the economy, which was in recession at the time.
This is an example of expansionary fiscal policy. Cutting taxes increases
disposable personal income, and if consumers respond to this increase
in disposable income by increasing their spending, then tax cuts can help
move the economy out of recession. This also provides an important example
of the interaction of government and the economy. Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
| Equilibrium | In
July 2001 President Bush signed into law a $1.35 trillion tax cut that
reduced marginal tax rates across the board. The President said that the
tax cuts would help boost the economy, which was in recession at the time.
For normal goods, an increase in disposable income is expected to cause
an increase in demand. If individual product markets were previously in
equilibrium, then the increase in demand caused by the tax cut is expected
to result in a new equilibrium in individual product markets. This new
equilibrium will feature a larger equilibrium quantity and price.
Review other EconData for this subject, or visit additional resources: |
©2003 South-Western. All Rights Reserved webmaster | DISCLAIMER