South-Western - Management  
'Pay for Performance', or 'Pay for Pulse'?
Topic Human Resource Management
Key Words Executive compensation, restricted stock, stock options
InfoTrac Reference A131634445
If your textbook came with an InfoTrac passcode, click here to login on InfoTrac.
News Story

Under increasing pressure from regulators and others, companies are changing the way they reward their top executives. As traditional incentives such as cash bonuses and stock options have become more costly and controversial for companies, another form of executive compensation has gained favor: restricted stock.

Restricted stock is stock that passes to an executive over a period of time. Since its value fluctuates like the unrestricted shares held by most investors, restricted stock better aligns executives' long-term interests with those of shareholders. The appeal of restricted stock is that it puts executives in the same boat as ordinary shareholders.

While restricted stock is touted as a compensation that links pay to performance, some critics deny the performance link and deride the popular incentive as "pay for pulse." They argue that restricted stock costs executives nothing and, thus, rewards them regardless of results. In response, proponents of the compensation point out that restricted stock is worth less if the company's share price goes down and, therefore, performance is part of the equation.

Questions
1.

Do you think executive compensation should always be based on performance? Why or why not?

2.

Do you think restricted stock is an equitable way to reward executives? Explain.

Source Frederick P. Gabriel Jr., "Exec pay + bonuses down, but restricted stock is on rise; Firms use those rewards to tie pay to performance," Investment News, April 11, 2005 v9 i14 p3.
Instructor Discussion Notes Discussion Notes
These notes are restricted to qualified instructors only. Register for free!

Return to the Human Resource Management Index

©2005  South-Western.  All Rights Reserved