![]() |
SW LEGAL'S
CASE UPDATES—SALES
|
|
Title
|
Summary
|
|
UCC Contracts Do Not Allow Tort Claims
Briefed Case | Wisconsin high court held that a contract governed by the UCC allows for possible damages for breach of contract or warranty, but it does not allow for tort claims. Were tort claims allowed, parties would have little ability or incentive to construct bargains that allocate risk. (Updated November, 2005) |
|
UCC Warranty Rights Not Eliminated by Lemon Law for Defective Cars
Briefed Case | Missouri appeals court held that while the statute
of limitations may have run out under the state Lemon Law concerning defective
new vehicles, the buyers had the right to bring warranty claims under the
UCC, which has a longer statute of limitations. (Updated July, 2005) |
|
Cigarette Death Suit May Proceed Under UCC Claim
Briefed Case | Appeals court held that under Alabama law the
estate of a deceased smoker could not bring suit against cigarette makers
in tort, but it could proceed on the basis that cigarettes were not fit
for use by consumers and so breached the implied warranty of merchantability. (Updated December, 2004) |
|
Sale of Unfinished Goods Is Sale of Goods, Not Service,
under the UCC
Briefed Case | Appeals court held that the UCC governed a contract,
not the common law, as the primary value in the contract was the provision
of unfinished goods to be used by the buyer in its production. That is a
sale of goods, not a service. (Updated November, 2004) |
|
Buyer Has Remedy Against Seller, Not Manufacturer,
in Case of Revocation of Sale
Briefed Case | Appeals court affirmed that when a buyer revokes
a sale, which places the parties in the position they were before the sale
occurred, the cause of action is against the seller of the goods, not the
manufacturer, even if defect of the goods is the primary reason for the
revocation. (Updated May, 2003) |
|
Oral Modification of Contract Rejected; Buyer May
Collect Consequential Damages from Seller's Breach
Briefed Case | Appeals court held that an alleged
oral modification of a contract, which would control the outcome of the
claim of breach, was to be rejected because it was inconsistent with other
evidence. Because of the seller's breach, the buyer could collect consequential
damages. (Updated April 1, 2001) |
|
Purchase Order Was An Offer, It Did Not Create a
Contract
Briefed Case | Appeals court affirmed dismissal
of suit by buyer who submitted an order to buy a product based on an earlier
discussion of the price of the product. The order to buy was an offer that
was then rejected by the seller, so no contract was formed and there was
no breach. (Updated September 1, 2000) |
|
Motor Home Was Not Fit for Particular Purpose
Briefed Case | Appeals court upheld an award of
damages to consumer who bought a new motor home and had specifically discussed
the power and braking needs, which the vehicle did not live up to. This
was breach of warranty of fitness for a particular purpose for which damages
could be awarded. (Updated September 1, 2000) |
|
Industry Trade Usage Determines Damages When No Contract
to the Contrary Produced
Briefed Case | Appeals court affirmed that the seller
of bottle-labeling equipment was correct in its assertion that, in a case
where its equipment failed to operate as promised, a refund was the proper
remedy. Since the parties lost the original contract, the court relied on
trade usage, which was shown to be a refund, and did not include consequential
damages suffered by the bottler. (Updated November 1, 1999) |
|
Arbitration Provision in Consumer Sales Contract
Held Unconscionable
Briefed Case | A New York appeals court held that
Gateway's standard sales clause requiring arbitration of disputes under
the rules of the International Chamber of Commerce was unconscionable under
the UCC because the cost of arbitration generally exceeded the cost of the
products involved. (Updated September 1, 1999) |
|
Sale of Used Boat with Hidden Major Defect Subject
to Recission
Briefed Case | Louisiana appeals court held that
the purchase price of a used power boat, sold by a consumer to a consumer,
should be refunded since the boat contained major defects that rendered
it useless and the defects could not be uncovered by a person not skilled
in examining such equipment. (Updated June 1, 1999) |
|
Proper Tender of Goods Depends on Terms of Contracts
Briefed Case | Michigan high court held that a manufacturer
that only agreed to sell goods did not have an obligation to install or
test the goods, so the statute of limitations regarding the sale ran from
the time the goods were properly tendered. (Updated May 1, 1999) |
|
Purchase Order Need Not Be Signed for There to Be
Acceptance
Briefed Case | Hong Kong buying agent accepted a
contract, and its arbitration requirement, when it showed agreement by fulfilling
the terms of a purchase order, rather than by signing the order. (Updated 4-6-98) |
|
Written Warranty May Be Void if Goods Accepted Subject
to Oral Qualifications
Briefed Case | The authenticity of a painting sold
with a warranty was unclear. The dealer said he told the buyer of its history;
the buyer says no. Summary judgment for breach of warranty not proper; material
facts need to be determined at trial. (Updated 12-29-97) |
|
Borden Pays Big Clams for Breach of Good Faith
Briefed Case | New Jersey Supreme Court affirms
judgment of trial court for breach of UCC section 1-203 which imposes the
obligation of good faith in the performance of a contract. (Updated September 12, 1997) |
©1997-2002 SW Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved.