![]() |
SOUTH-WESTERN LEGAL STUDIES IN BUSINESS
CASE UPDATESBANKRUPTCY
|
|
Title
|
Summary
|
Injury Claim against Employer Fails Because Not Filed Before Bankruptcy Discharged Briefed Case |
Washington high court held that a personal injury claim by a worker against his former employer failed. He was aware of the injury before bankruptcy proceedings began but failed to notify the employer of his possible claim. As an unknown creditor, his claim was discharged by the proceedings. |
Former Bank Director Not Insider for Purposes of Preferential Transfer Issues Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a long retired director of a bank, accused to making preferential payments to the bank prior to filing bankruptcy, was not an insider, so there was no preferential treatment issue requiring the bank to repay the money to the bankruptcy trustee. |
Trustee May Sue on Behalf of Bankrupt Estate to Try to Recover Looted Funds Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that the trustee of a bankrupt firm could sue former executives and attorneys for looting the firm immediately prior to bankruptcy. Such suit need not only be brought by creditors of the bankrupt firm; the trustee can enforce the obligations of executives and attorneys. |
Bad Faith by Bankrupt Forfeits Right to Convert from Chapter 7 to Chapter 13 Briefed Case |
Supreme Court held that when a Chapter 7 bankrupt was shown to have hidden assets, the bad faith behavior allows the court to prohibit the petitioner from converting to Chapter 13, which was a right otherwise. |
Yacht Not a Homestead in Texas Briefed Case |
Texas high court held that a yacht, which is mobile, cannot qualify for homestead exemption under the Bankruptcy Code as it is not attached to land. Temporary mooring at a dock does not qualify as attached to land as the boat is capable of sailing away. |
Cable Television Service Not Necessary Utility for Bankrupt Briefed Case |
Appeals court agreed that a cable television service provider had no obligation to provide service as requested by a customer in Chapter 13. Utility providers must provide service, but cable service is not a necessary utility. |
Speech Restrictions in 2005 Bankruptcy Reform Act Unconstitutional Briefed Case |
Trial court held that bankruptcy attorneys many not be prevented from advising their bankruptcy clients to take financial actions that are legal under the bankruptcy law. Restriction on advice is unconstitutional under the free speech provisions of the First Amendment. |
Trustees in Bankruptcy May Not Sue Parties Who Aided Fraud Committed by Bankrupt Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that the rights of a trustee in bankruptcy to sue are the same as the rights the bankrupt had at the time of filing bankruptcy. Hence, the trustee may not sue parties who participated in a fraud committed by the bankrupt. |
IRAs and Other Pension Funds Exempt from Bankruptcy Briefed Case |
Supreme Court held that IRAs and other funds due to be paid under a plan or contract, based on age or some other specific factor, are protected for the benefit of the debtor in case of bankruptcy. |
Homestead Exemption May Apply to Property in Another State Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that bankrupts are regarded as residents of the state in which they spent the most time in the180 days prior to filing. That meant the homestead exemption of that state would apply, even though they had sold their home and moved to another state. |
|
Student Debt Obligation Not Relieved Unless Undue Hardship Shown
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a bankruptcy court improperly
absolved a student loan debtor of the remaining balance on a debt. Such
debts are not absolved unless there is a hearing on the matter involving
the creditor and debtor, where the debtor proves undue hardship. (Updated July 2005) |
|
One Day Late; Many Dollars Short
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a claim against a bankrupt
company that was filed one day late did not have to be accepted by the bankruptcy
court. The claimant knew of the filing deadline and had no good excuse for
not filing before the deadline, so the claim is lost. (Updated December 2004) |
|
Argument Not Developed in Bankruptcy Proceedings
May Not Be Made on Appeal
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a creditor must advance
its arguments during bankruptcy proceedings or it may not raise the arguments
on appeal. While a creditor objected to a cigarette allowance for a debtor,
the creditor failed to provide a reason for its objection before the bankruptcy
court, and so may not raise the argument on appeal. (Updated December 2004) |
|
No Partial Discharge of Student Loans Absent Hardship
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a bankruptcy court improperly
allowed partial discharge of student loans. The debtor failed to show that
she suffered hardship as she had non-essential expenses such as a cell phone
and cable TV, and it was likely that her income would rise in the future. (Updated November 2004) |
|
Independent Examiner May Be Appointed to Review
Proposed Changes in Employee Benefits
Briefed Case |
Bankruptcy court accepted the motion of a union
that an independent examiner be appointed to assist the court in reviewing
a proposed cut in retirement benefits proposed by an employer in Chapter
11 reorganization. An examiner can help provide an objective review of the
finances involved and the timing of the proposed changes. (Updated April 2004) |
|
Debt That May Have Been Obtained by Fraud Not Dischargeable
in Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Supreme Court held that where parties had agreed
to a settlement of a suit that claimed fraud, and then the debtor filed
for bankruptcy, the settlement agreement was not dischargeable in bankruptcy
because it may have been obtained by fraud. (Updated July 2003) |
|
Rural Homestead Conditions Defined by State Statute
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a relative of company
executives, who was paid a very large sum for managerial duties prior to
bankruptcy of the firm, may present the defense of good faith for value
before the jury to determine if the payment she received was justified or
not. (Updated July 2003) |
|
Jury Will Determine if Good Faith Defense Applies
to Alleged Fraudulent Transfer
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a relative
of company executives, who was paid a very large sum for managerial duties
prior to bankruptcy of the firm, may present the defense of good faith for
value before the jury to determine if the payment she received was justified
or not. (Updated February 2003) |
|
Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Can Force Cramdown of Home
Equity Loan
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that under Chapter
13, bankruptcy could force the makers of a home equity loan to accept a
cramdown, where the secured portion of the loan shrinks to the actual value
of the equity in the home, not the amount of the entire loan. (Updated December 2002) |
|
Repossessed Cars Not Part of Bankruptcy Estate
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that creditors
of motor vehicles who repossess the vehicles upon payment default are the
owners of the vehicles, so long as the repossession takes place before bankruptcy
is filed. The vehicles do not become a part of the bankruptcy estate. (Updated September 2002) |
|
Parties Financially Impacted by Bankruptcy Court
Decisions Have Standing to Intervene
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that under the
person aggrieved doctrine, parties who are directly affected by the decision
of a bankruptcy court, because they suffer a financial loss, have standing
to intervene to appeal the decision of a trustee or bankruptcy court. (Updated September 2002) |
|
Inherited Wedding Rings Not Exempt Property Under
State Law
Briefed Case |
Wyoming high court held that the
wedding rings a bankrupt individual had inherited from her mother, which
were not used as wedding rings, were not exempt property and so were property
of the estate. The state law differs from federal law in this regard, as
permitted by the Bankruptcy Code. (Updated April 2002) |
|
Objections to Bankruptcy Plan Must Fall Within Statutory
Specifications
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a bankruptcy
court must follow the specific steps set for construction of a bankruptcy
plan and could not craft requirements for a debtor that are not provided
by the statute. The law allows objections to a plan on specific bases; the
bankruptcy court must use those bases for evaluating objections. (Updated March 2002) |
|
Student Loans Rarely Dischargeable in Chapter 13
Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Court reversed the bankruptcy court
decision that student loans could be discharged. Such discharge is allowed
only if there is a showing of undue hardship on the debtor and the creditor
must have the opportunity to participate in an adversarial proceeding on
the matter. (Updated February 2002) |
|
Bankrupt Had No Duty to Reveal Plans to Sue in Tort
After Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a party
who incurred a tort claim while in bankruptcy proceedings, but intentionally
waited to file the suit until he was discharged from bankruptcy, is not
estopped from pursuing the tort claim, even though it occurred while he
was in bankruptcy. (Updated December 1, 2001) |
|
Trustee Not to Be Removed Except for Intentional
Misconduct or Negligence
Briefed Case |
Court refused the request of several
creditors to remove the trustee from a bankrupt estate. The creditors believed
that the trustee was going to settle a case for far less than could be had
by litigation. Court refused to remove the trustee, noting a split in opinion
of the creditors, and the lack of evidence of misconduct or negligence on
the part of the trustee. (Updated December 1, 2001) |
|
Environmental Lien Not Stayed by Filing Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Appeals court affirmed that a lien
filed against property to help secure the recovery of costs for the cleanup
of an environmental hazard on debtor's property was exempt from the automatic
stay that applied to most liens once bankruptcy is filed. Congress intended
for such environmental liens to take priority over earlier perfected liens. (Updated November 1, 2001) |
|
Judgments from Willful and Malicious Torts Are Not
Dischargeable in Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Appeals court affirmed that a damage
award for a willful and malicious tort is a debt that cannot be discharged
in bankruptcy by the tortfeasor. While other tort awards may be discharged
in bankruptcy, those that rise to the level of willful and malicious are
not. (Updated September 1, 2001) |
|
Unsecured Liens on Property of Bankrupt May be Extinguished
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a valid,
recorded lien on real property could be voided in Chapter 13 bankruptcy
because the value of the property is not sufficient to provide any security
for any part of the lien. (Updated August 1, 2001) |
|
Unionized Workers May File Mechanic's Liens Against
Bankrupt Employer to Secure Vacation Pay
Briefed Case |
Appeals court overturned an earlier
decision and held that unionized workers, like non-union workers, have the
right to file mechanic's liens against an employer in bankruptcy to secure
their claim for unpaid vacation time. Federal labor law does not conflict
with this state law provision. (Updated August 1, 2001) |
|
Savings and Loan Capital Requirements Must Be Met
Prior to Chapter 11
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that before a
savings and loan could enter Chapter 11 reorganization, its owners must
provide the capital needed to eliminate its deficit. The owners promised
federal regulators they would maintain the capital requirements; that commitment
must be met before bankruptcy proceedings. (Updated May 1, 2001) |
|
Failure to List Tort Claim on Bankruptcy Petition
Precludes Tort Proceedings
Briefed Case |
Georgia high court upheld the dismissal
of a tort claim filed by a party in bankruptcy against a person involved
in an auto accident with them. Since the tort claim was an asset of the
estate, and it was not revealed in the listing of assets, the bankrupt party
is estopped from pursuing the tort claim as that would be manipulation of
the court system. (Updated March 1, 2001) |
|
Intended Use of Property May Control Valuation as
Part of Bankrupt Estate
Briefed Case |
Court upheld the valuation of a parcel
of land at a lower value based on its current and intended use by parties
in bankruptcy. The parties do not have to convert the land to a higher valued
use by subdividing the land, as was requested by a creditor. (Updated February 1, 2001) |
|
Attempt to Collect Rent from Tenant in Bankruptcy
Violated Bankruptcy Code
Briefed Case |
District court held that a landlord
was in contempt of the Bankruptcy Code by attempting to collect rent due,
which violated the discharge of debt injunction and automatic stay of creditors
that occurs in Chapter 7 bankruptcy. (Updated January 1, 2001) |
|
Secured Debt Under Chapter 13 May Not Be Converted
by Debtor to Unsecured Debt
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that a debtor
who is complying with a court-confirmed repayment plan under Chapter 13
may not later convert a secured debt, such as owed on an automobile, to
an unsecured debt, so that the debtor can incur more debt. (Updated December 1, 2000) |
|
Workers' Compensation Insurance Premiums Not Entitled
to Priority Status
Briefed Case |
Appeals court affirmed a decision
that unpaid workers' compensation insurance premiums were not entitled to
the priority status that is allowed for payments to employee benefit plans.
Workers' compensation is mandated by state law; it is not a benefit provided
voluntarily. (Updated October 1, 2000) |
|
IRS Policy to Refuse All Offers of Compromise from
Bankrupt Taxpayers Violates Bankruptcy Code
Briefed Case |
Bankruptcy judge held that the IRS
policy to refuse all offers to compromise on federal tax debts owed by bankrupts
violates the anti-discrimination provision of the Bankruptcy Code. Non-bankrupt
taxpayers are, at the discretion of the IRS, offered compromises, so the
policy must be the same for bankrupt taxpayers. (Updated April 1, 2000) |
|
Asset Transfer to Lawyers at Time of Bankruptcy
Filing is Voidable Preference
Briefed Case |
Appeals court held that the transfer
of assets from a bankrupt firm to its legal counsel, on the day bankruptcy
was filed, was a voidable preference. The law firm had no right to receive
full payment for work previously done or for work to be done for the bankrupt
firm, so the assets would be returned and the firm could not represent the
bankrupt firm in the proceedings. (Updated October 1, 1999) |
|
New Value May Not Be Granted to Prebankruptcy Equity
Holder Over Objection of Impaired Creditors
Briefed Case |
Supreme Court reversed lower courts
approval of a judicial cramdown, where a Chapter 11 reorganization was approved
over objection of the primary creditor of the bankrupt, where the reorganization
would grant new value to the equity holders of the same organization. (Updated October 1, 1999) |
|
Court Uses "Totality of Circumstances"
for Test of Substantial Abuse by Debtor
Briefed Case |
Appeals court adopted "totality
of circumstances" test for bankruptcy proceedings to determine if a
debtor has engaged in substantial abuse of the process by filing for Chapter
7 bankruptcy, when in fact there is sufficient income to repay debts. (Updated May 1, 1999) |
|
Bankruptcy Plan Cannot Change Creditor Priorities
Set by Statute
Briefed Case |
Appeals court reversed bankruptcy
court decision on Chapter 11 reorganization plan that gave higher priority
status to one tax claim over another. Courts cannot weaken the statutory
priority rights established by Congress in the bankruptcy code. (Updated April 1, 1999) |
|
Default Interest Rate Due from Date of Default
Briefed Case |
Appeals court affirmed decision
that Chapter 11 reorganization proceedings did not extinguish the terms
of a loan that required higher interest payments to be made once default
occurred. Stay during bankruptcy did not extinguish the right to higher
interest rate payments to creditors. (Updated April 1, 1999) |
|
No Right to Avoid Publicity from Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Chapter 7 debtors not allowed to
use their attorney's address in another town in an effort to keep parents
and employer from learning of their bankruptcy. Except in rare case, publicity
is important part of bankruptcy so that community is on notice. (Updated October 19, 1998) |
|
Student Loans Not Discharged After Seven Years if
Good Faith Error in Repayment Suspension
Briefed Case |
Debtor requested suspension of repayment
of student loans while enrolled as part-time student after graduation. Lender
mistakenly granted suspension of repayment. Bankruptcy, filed more than
seven years after loan repayment should have started, did not discharge
student loans since payment extension was erroneously granted in good faith.
(Updated October 5, 1998) |
|
Treble Damages for Fraud Not Dischargable in Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Landlord, convicted of fraud in overcharging tenants, is not allowed
to discharge the rent overcharges or the treble damages and attorney's
fees the tenants won under New Jersey Consumer Fraud Act. Supreme Court
noted that the Bankruptcy Code affords relief only to the "honest but
unfortunate debtor." |
|
Industry Standards Primary Guide to Determine Preferential
Transfers
Briefed Case |
Debtor construction company paid
one supplier shortly before bankruptcy. Whether the payment was to be avoided
as a preferential transfer would depend primarily on industry standards,
not the ordinary course of business. (Updated May 29, 1998) |
|
Malpractice Judgment Discharged in Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
Physician filed for bankruptcy after
losing large malpractice judgment to patient. Patient's request that malpractice
judgment not be discharged in bankruptcy rejected by Supreme Court because
the Code specified that only debts for "willful and malicious injury" are
not discharged. (Updated May 29, 1998) |
|
Discharge Standard for Student Loans Set for Sixth
Circuit
Briefed Case |
Chapter 7 bankrupt requested discharge
of student loans. Bankruptcy Appellate Panel determined that the Sixth Circuit
would adopt the Brunner test to cover claims of undue hardship that would
permit student loan discharges. (Updated March 11, 1998) |
|
Claims from Willful Torts Not Relieved in Bankruptcy
Briefed Case |
When plaintiff sued for sexual battery,
an intentional tort, the defendant filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy. Plaintiff
filed adversary proceeding in bankruptcy court seeking that any monetary
liability from the tort claim be held nondischargeable under the Bankruptcy
Code. Court agreed. (Updated October 15, 1997) |
©1997-2008 South-Western Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved.