| States May Not Tax "Independently Procured Insurance" from Across State Lines | |
| Description | Texas appeals court held that the state could not impose a tax on insurance purchased by firms doing business in Texas that obtain insurance on their property in the state from out-of-state insurance companies not licensed to do business in Texas. |
| Topic | Insurance |
| Key Words | McCarran-Ferguson; Taxation; Due Process |
| C A S E S U M M A R Y | |
| Facts | Dow Chemical, a Delaware company headquartered in Michigan, owns property in Texas. It insures the property through out-of-state insurance companies. Those companies are not authorized to sell insurance in Texas. Texas law calls such insurance "independently procured insurance" and imposes a tax on it. The Comptroller of Texas billed Dow over $400,000 for taxes owed on the insurance. Dow protested the tax. The district court dismissed the suit; Dow appealed. |
| Decision | Reversed. The state's "independently procured insurance" statute violates the federal McCarran-Ferguson Act. Insurance is interstate commerce. The Act allows insurance to be regulated by the states, but the states may not discriminate against out-of-state insurers or it violates the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment by imposing taxes on companies that have no business presence in the state. |
| Citation | Dow Chemical Co. v. Rylander, - S.W.3d - (2001 WL 58001, Ct. App., Tex., 2001) |
Back to Insurance Listings
©1997-2002 SW Legal Studies in Business. All Rights Reserved.