
| Federal Regulation of Gambling Does Not Violate Commerce Clause Powers of Congress | |
| Description | Circuit court upheld the constitutionality of a federal statute regulating gambling. A person convicted under the federal statute contended that it violated the Commerce Clause, but the court held that it did not as there was a rational relationship between the regulation and commercial activity. |
| Topic | Constitutional Law |
| Key Words | Commerce Clause, Gambling |
| C A S E S U M M A R Y | |
| Facts | Lee was convicted of running an illegal gambling casino in Georgia in violation of a federal gambling statute. Lee contended that under the Commerce Clause the federal statute is an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's power. The district court rejected the defense; Lee appealed. |
| Decision | Affirmed. The circuit joins two other circuits that have considered the same issue in light of U.S. v. Lopez (514 U.S. 549), where the Supreme Court invalidated the Gun-Free School Zones Act as an unconstitutional exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause. The gambling statute is constitutional because it bears a much stronger relationship to commerce and has a rational basis to the regulation of gambling. |
| Citation | U.S. v. Lee, 173 F.3d 809 (11th Cir., 1999) |
Back to Constitutional Law Listings
©2000 South-Western, a division of Cengage Learning, Inc. Cengage Learning is a trademark used herein under license.